Crossfire VS 2005 SLK 350(non-AMG)

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

#81 (permalink)

04-10-2005 | 01:31 PM

mbepic

Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 1,059

Likes: 0

From: Port Perry, Ontario

Re: Crossfire VS 2005 SLK 350(non-AMG)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bullseye

Now I am the Bullseye the realist.

yea, I always thought that blabber crap was the real Bullseye.

Reply Like

#82 (permalink)

04-10-2005 | 03:16 PM

Bullseye

Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 1,023

Likes: 0

From: Chicago, IL

Re: Crossfire VS 2005 SLK 350(non-AMG)

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbepic

yea, I always thought that blabber crap was the real Bullseye.

Which part of my car information is crap? It is all valid.

Reply Like

#83 (permalink)

04-10-2005 | 10:55 PM

mbepic

Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 1,059

Likes: 0

From: Port Perry, Ontario

Re: Crossfire VS 2005 SLK 350(non-AMG)

For starters, the interior is too tight. You know the seat does go right back or do you have to hug the steering wheel?

Reply Like

#84 (permalink)

04-11-2005 | 04:42 AM

Bullseye

Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 1,023

Likes: 0

From: Chicago, IL

Re: Crossfire VS 2005 SLK 350(non-AMG)

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbepic

For starters, the interior is too tight. You know the seat does go right back or do you have to hug the steering wheel?

I am 6'1" and my legs are very long. Just because someone that is 5'9" like you doesnt mean everyone fits like a glove. My friend is 5'2" and she fits without a problem. I only stated if you are over 6 foot, you may want to look elsewhere. So yes for me its too tight.

Reply Like