eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
Re: eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
Area in a hole is = Pi x R squared
R = 1/2 diameter
74 mm hole area is equal to 74/2 = 37 squared x Pi
R is 1/2 the diameter of 74, therefore it is = 37
*********************
37 x 37 = 1369
Two holes are twice (1369), thus 2 x 1369 = 2738
square root of 2738 = 52.325
52.325 is the equivalent radius thus the diameter is 2 x 52.325 = 104.7
*************************
I did not use Pi and then divide by PI so please forgive my short math hand.
two 74 mm TB's are equal in area to one of 104mm.
104 is bigger than most TB's on the market. ITs right there with the 5.7 dodge hemi!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry for the homework........W DY
R = 1/2 diameter
74 mm hole area is equal to 74/2 = 37 squared x Pi
R is 1/2 the diameter of 74, therefore it is = 37
*********************
37 x 37 = 1369
Two holes are twice (1369), thus 2 x 1369 = 2738
square root of 2738 = 52.325
52.325 is the equivalent radius thus the diameter is 2 x 52.325 = 104.7
*************************
I did not use Pi and then divide by PI so please forgive my short math hand.
two 74 mm TB's are equal in area to one of 104mm.
104 is bigger than most TB's on the market. ITs right there with the 5.7 dodge hemi!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry for the homework........W DY
Re: eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
Originally Posted by 32krazy!
is not double 74 = 148? 74 x 2 =148 were i went to school! is it still 74mm because of the restriction at the supercharger inlet? trying to grasp this but im a tad slo in my old age!
Re: eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
Originally Posted by waldig
Area in a hole is = Pi x R squared
R = 1/2 diameter
74 mm hole area is equal to 74/2 = 37 squared x Pi
R is 1/2 the diameter of 74, therefore it is = 37
*********************
37 x 37 = 1369
Two holes are twice (1369), thus 2 x 1369 = 2738
square root of 2738 = 52.325
52.325 is the equivalent radius thus the diameter is 2 x 52.325 = 104.7
*************************
I did not use Pi and then divide by PI so please forgive my short math hand.
two 74 mm TB's are equal in area to one of 104mm.
104 is bigger than most TB's on the market. ITs right there with the 5.7 dodge hemi!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry for the homework........W DY
R = 1/2 diameter
74 mm hole area is equal to 74/2 = 37 squared x Pi
R is 1/2 the diameter of 74, therefore it is = 37
*********************
37 x 37 = 1369
Two holes are twice (1369), thus 2 x 1369 = 2738
square root of 2738 = 52.325
52.325 is the equivalent radius thus the diameter is 2 x 52.325 = 104.7
*************************
I did not use Pi and then divide by PI so please forgive my short math hand.
two 74 mm TB's are equal in area to one of 104mm.
104 is bigger than most TB's on the market. ITs right there with the 5.7 dodge hemi!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry for the homework........W DY
dinasrt if i dont ask ill never figure it out!! see i let the smart kids figure it out then i copy their homework. it works!!!
Re: eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
Thanks for the responce on the boost question Woody.
Is your cross chamber manifold mod a key part in this setup? Wondering if your gains with the dual t/b setup would be inflated by your CCM or if the dual t/b setup operates as expected without the CCM .
Is your cross chamber manifold mod a key part in this setup? Wondering if your gains with the dual t/b setup would be inflated by your CCM or if the dual t/b setup operates as expected without the CCM .
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 37
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
Changing the gearing would also work, but there are issues with the AIR increase as the motor is not expecting it and will spit up....colick.
Dont know how to get gears, I have taken apart two TBS and its not simple.
The TB offers some restriction (plate) so that is reduced and the SC has more air, but not so much. What happens is that the SC gets more and faster air on the takeoff. The car gets throttle sooner without the delay, and the sprint booster assists this whole process.
Its all about getting moving sooner, after your wide open there is little change but you get there sooner, oh yeah. Woody
The cross overs allow more air as the valve opens, doing one better than Robs big manifold AS IT ALLOWS BOTH TUBES TO FEED THE INTAKE MANIFOLDS. Instead of one side then the other getting a valve full of boost, both sides are sharing the tubes to the wye. Its about less restriction from the intercooler outlet to the valve s. That will assist power across the rpm range, more so on the high end. DYNO is the only way to see if I got it right or NOT. Star trek: WORKING.
Dont know how to get gears, I have taken apart two TBS and its not simple.
The TB offers some restriction (plate) so that is reduced and the SC has more air, but not so much. What happens is that the SC gets more and faster air on the takeoff. The car gets throttle sooner without the delay, and the sprint booster assists this whole process.
Its all about getting moving sooner, after your wide open there is little change but you get there sooner, oh yeah. Woody
The cross overs allow more air as the valve opens, doing one better than Robs big manifold AS IT ALLOWS BOTH TUBES TO FEED THE INTAKE MANIFOLDS. Instead of one side then the other getting a valve full of boost, both sides are sharing the tubes to the wye. Its about less restriction from the intercooler outlet to the valve s. That will assist power across the rpm range, more so on the high end. DYNO is the only way to see if I got it right or NOT. Star trek: WORKING.
Last edited by waldig; 07-12-2011 at 07:26 PM.
Re: eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
Originally Posted by SRT6 Gang Member
Thanks for the responce on the boost question Woody.
Is your cross chamber manifold mod a key part in this setup? Wondering if your gains with the dual t/b setup would be inflated by your CCM or if the dual t/b setup operates as expected without the CCM .
Is your cross chamber manifold mod a key part in this setup? Wondering if your gains with the dual t/b setup would be inflated by your CCM or if the dual t/b setup operates as expected without the CCM .
Just read Woody's edit above about this. Still, it would be nice if it was closely as good w/o the CCM.
Last edited by dinasrt; 07-12-2011 at 07:44 PM.
Re: eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
Woody..I got my hand raised for a question. I'm sure you've thought all this mod out well,but what would be the problem with just using a single HEMI 104MM throttle body? With the dual throttle body's located close by the radiator,seems like you would have to get creative to hook-up throttle body cable's to the accelerator petal. I'm interested in your new mod after it's been dyno'ed and tweeked. Great Job Woody! ....Squirrel Crusher
Re: eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
I thought the delay in throttle response was due to the drive by wire, and the fact there is some sort of electronic delay before the throttle body plate actually adjusts, unlike cables where its instantaneous.
Woody are you saying there is also a lag issue with the design of the whole intake setup from filter to intake valve?
Woody are you saying there is also a lag issue with the design of the whole intake setup from filter to intake valve?
Re: eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
The length and area of the intake has no tuning effect because of the damping the SC and HE have on any pressure WAVES caused by the inlet valves in the head. Carbs and FI can have the length of the runners maximize the inlet charge at a specific RPM, not so for us.
I had the dual inlet design in the back of my head when I did the design of the dual CAI.
I stuck with the pair of 74’s to save money and maybe make this into a kit - after the DYNO proves the operation. The design basically is one additional TB, some TB reworking, cables and stuff. We reuse the inlet pipes, air filters, to keep it simple and allow it to be reversible – removable.
A single pipe of 4” would not fit , would not have a filter that went in front of the radiator or pass thru the rad. Bulkhead for that matter.
I was working to get more air sooner into the engine so that the revs could begin to build faster. This is to allow better bottom end power and street drivability. The top end boost should be a touch higher due to less restriction in the overall inlet system. Bottom end boost is hard to see as it changes with the rpm – so fast that its hard to follow and the logs on Zeitronix are hard to decode to prove it one way or the other.
Its been fun doing this and I hope that it gets yall thinking. The twin charged results have me thinking more. My stacked pullies were going to 25 # AND was scary to me, may deserve another look. The supercharger is not maxed out from what I see from that posting. ENJOY, Woody
I had the dual inlet design in the back of my head when I did the design of the dual CAI.
I stuck with the pair of 74’s to save money and maybe make this into a kit - after the DYNO proves the operation. The design basically is one additional TB, some TB reworking, cables and stuff. We reuse the inlet pipes, air filters, to keep it simple and allow it to be reversible – removable.
A single pipe of 4” would not fit , would not have a filter that went in front of the radiator or pass thru the rad. Bulkhead for that matter.
I was working to get more air sooner into the engine so that the revs could begin to build faster. This is to allow better bottom end power and street drivability. The top end boost should be a touch higher due to less restriction in the overall inlet system. Bottom end boost is hard to see as it changes with the rpm – so fast that its hard to follow and the logs on Zeitronix are hard to decode to prove it one way or the other.
Its been fun doing this and I hope that it gets yall thinking. The twin charged results have me thinking more. My stacked pullies were going to 25 # AND was scary to me, may deserve another look. The supercharger is not maxed out from what I see from that posting. ENJOY, Woody
Re: eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
Woody, In the above posting, you mentioned "cables". I am thinking you are just using one electronic TB controlled from the ECU, with a cable going from it to the other to mimic the first? I would think the ECU wouldn't like the amperage requirements (CEL,SES,MIL) for two electronic TB connected parallel. Just curious but maybe it is a trade secret at this point.
James.
James.
Last edited by James1549; 07-13-2011 at 08:55 PM.
Re: eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
Originally Posted by waldig
The length and area of the intake has no tuning effect because of the damping the SC and HE have on any pressure WAVES caused by the inlet valves in the head. Carbs and FI can have the length of the runners maximize the inlet charge at a specific RPM, not so for us.
I had the dual inlet design in the back of my head when I did the design of the dual CAI.
I stuck with the pair of 74’s to save money and maybe make this into a kit - after the DYNO proves the operation. The design basically is one additional TB, some TB reworking, cables and stuff. We reuse the inlet pipes, air filters, to keep it simple and allow it to be reversible – removable.
A single pipe of 4” would not fit , would not have a filter that went in front of the radiator or pass thru the rad. Bulkhead for that matter.
I was working to get more air sooner into the engine so that the revs could begin to build faster. This is to allow better bottom end power and street drivability. The top end boost should be a touch higher due to less restriction in the overall inlet system. Bottom end boost is hard to see as it changes with the rpm – so fast that its hard to follow and the logs on Zeitronix are hard to decode to prove it one way or the other.
Its been fun doing this and I hope that it gets yall thinking. The twin charged results have me thinking more. My stacked pullies were going to 25 # AND was scary to me, may deserve another look. The supercharger is not maxed out from what I see from that posting. ENJOY, Woody
I had the dual inlet design in the back of my head when I did the design of the dual CAI.
I stuck with the pair of 74’s to save money and maybe make this into a kit - after the DYNO proves the operation. The design basically is one additional TB, some TB reworking, cables and stuff. We reuse the inlet pipes, air filters, to keep it simple and allow it to be reversible – removable.
A single pipe of 4” would not fit , would not have a filter that went in front of the radiator or pass thru the rad. Bulkhead for that matter.
I was working to get more air sooner into the engine so that the revs could begin to build faster. This is to allow better bottom end power and street drivability. The top end boost should be a touch higher due to less restriction in the overall inlet system. Bottom end boost is hard to see as it changes with the rpm – so fast that its hard to follow and the logs on Zeitronix are hard to decode to prove it one way or the other.
Its been fun doing this and I hope that it gets yall thinking. The twin charged results have me thinking more. My stacked pullies were going to 25 # AND was scary to me, may deserve another look. The supercharger is not maxed out from what I see from that posting. ENJOY, Woody
Re: eureka, I got it running dyno to follow
I would like to share with you guys my experience with larger TB, i have a C32 eurocharged tuned, 180mm pulley,psk, HE, meziere pump, in trunk reservoir, full sl55 intake with k&n, EC long tube headers, no cats..., recently i installed 80mm TB, machined down the sc inlet from 74mm to 80mm, 80mm y pipe, what i got is a large amount of torque below 3000 rpm and yes it shift faster from first to second to third like Woody said but on the dyno i got the same hp and torque numbers from 3000 to 6000 rpm even 5 to 6 hp down.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kodebuster
Wheels, Brakes, Tires and Suspension
12
11-05-2020 04:06 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)