End of the Crossfire
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by jacksonman
John Johnson really confuses me. Granted, I paid $27,000 for my new 2004 Crossfire. However, he has lost no money until he sells. Ergo, keep the car, enjoy it for the reasons that he bought it for several years, and then sell. The price will pick up, in a manner similar to the 1993-1995 Mazda RX-7, particularly the R2 version. These cars languished in dealer lots for many months, were sold at large discounts, and then prices picked up considerably after the vehicle was cancelled and enthusiasts realized the classic design and uniqueness of the car. I predict that the Crossfire will follow a similar path. Hang on to your car, John! It seems foolish not to.
The other car getting compared is the prowler, yet they only made a bit over 11,000 of those throughout production. And they can be had for in the 20's in near brand new shape.
I do believe that the crossfire is going to level off however, there is going to be a plateu and they will hit the mid teens retail, 3-5 years old and it will hover around that, with bad and not perfect examples getting less.
The reason I believe the Crossfire is a flop, is it did not meet the general public's expectations let alone exceed. And for the money competition is tough, and there is alot more car out there for the cash. Please no comments on how the car meets your personal expectations, because personal expectations are not the general public's.
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by Bullseye
as "someone" (name will be left out) comparing a 63 Corvette and the crossfire and say it has the same principles.
And for the money competition is tough, and there is alot more car out there for the cash. Please no comments on how the car meets your personal expectations, because personal expectations are not the general public's.
And for the money competition is tough, and there is alot more car out there for the cash. Please no comments on how the car meets your personal expectations, because personal expectations are not the general public's.
Prove to me that the "someone" compared a 63 Corvette and the Crossfire and said it has the same principles, other than to say that they were both Sports Cars;
This last paragraph of yours is the only thing that you have ever said that made any sense at all; yes the competition in the Sports Car market is very tough; the market is diluted with these and THAT is the reason they are not selling like hotcakes.
Now don't ruin your record by coming back and saying anthing as dumb as you have before, PLEASE DON'T
Last edited by mbepic; 03-09-2005 at 09:41 AM.
Re: End of the Crossfire
Hey Guys,
The reason the cars are not selling is the same reason why the car lots are full of trucks.. no one is buying ....
Sports cars are an emotional purchase... not a need... we have two of them just for fun... and being in America (where they are cheap !!!) we have a large estate car too..
The general public is by and large a family unit when it comes to buying a car, so there are only a few groups able to decide to have fun... this wonderful car is not for the kids... it doesnt "shout enough" , well except in the Design area... but for us "Old Farts" it has more than enough "presence" and besides we impressed the girls years ago..wink!
Bullseye if you want a true road going sportscar.. try the Lotus its about as close to a sportscar as you can get.. and then if your Insurance company hasnt had a fit.. look for a TVR.
The reason the cars are not selling is the same reason why the car lots are full of trucks.. no one is buying ....
Sports cars are an emotional purchase... not a need... we have two of them just for fun... and being in America (where they are cheap !!!) we have a large estate car too..
The general public is by and large a family unit when it comes to buying a car, so there are only a few groups able to decide to have fun... this wonderful car is not for the kids... it doesnt "shout enough" , well except in the Design area... but for us "Old Farts" it has more than enough "presence" and besides we impressed the girls years ago..wink!
Bullseye if you want a true road going sportscar.. try the Lotus its about as close to a sportscar as you can get.. and then if your Insurance company hasnt had a fit.. look for a TVR.
Re: End of the Crossfire
Looking at how much xfires have depreciated, I'm actually glad of my lease payments now... I was one of the first to have a Crossfire because my neighbor is a dealer and gave me a good deal (at the time)....
$370 a month for 39 months = about $14,000 paid in total by lease end.. in exchange I get 15k miles a year + bonus 500 = 49,500 miles. Residual = $18,000 (and I won't buy it at the end).
The reason I'm glad for this is because the price they are going at now.. 21-22k or whatever... geez.. sure lease payments on that would be a lot cheaper, but thank god I didn't FINANCE one at 30-35k, cuz with the 15k miles I already have on it, I'd already have lost $14,000+ in value, which you buyers have, regardless of whether or not you sold it already...
Buyers have been screwed.. and imo its because of lack of publicity or advertising.. These cars are HOT.. and if they actually had some TV commercials and what not, these cars would be selling like hot cakes.. As it is, nobody knows our cars even exist! Which is why there are no buyers... I think its a simple matter that nobody realizes our cars are even for sale. If I didn't own one, I'd just think they were some expensive limited production run car that I could never afford.. I'm sure it would blow a lot of non-owners minds to know they can have one for under 25k. But of course DCX doesn't even advertise that fact...
I just don't get it. Why make such a great car and have such little publicity coverage? Put the Crossfire in one of those ads with the 300C damnit. I swear I'd be a better CEO of DCX than whoever that German dude is.
$370 a month for 39 months = about $14,000 paid in total by lease end.. in exchange I get 15k miles a year + bonus 500 = 49,500 miles. Residual = $18,000 (and I won't buy it at the end).
The reason I'm glad for this is because the price they are going at now.. 21-22k or whatever... geez.. sure lease payments on that would be a lot cheaper, but thank god I didn't FINANCE one at 30-35k, cuz with the 15k miles I already have on it, I'd already have lost $14,000+ in value, which you buyers have, regardless of whether or not you sold it already...
Buyers have been screwed.. and imo its because of lack of publicity or advertising.. These cars are HOT.. and if they actually had some TV commercials and what not, these cars would be selling like hot cakes.. As it is, nobody knows our cars even exist! Which is why there are no buyers... I think its a simple matter that nobody realizes our cars are even for sale. If I didn't own one, I'd just think they were some expensive limited production run car that I could never afford.. I'm sure it would blow a lot of non-owners minds to know they can have one for under 25k. But of course DCX doesn't even advertise that fact...
I just don't get it. Why make such a great car and have such little publicity coverage? Put the Crossfire in one of those ads with the 300C damnit. I swear I'd be a better CEO of DCX than whoever that German dude is.
Re: End of the Crossfire
I feel for everyone thats in a bad position on residual value as I have been there before, my first car when i came to the US I gfot screwed, but I learned to shop and search and never buy a car in the first year of production.
However from the other side of the spectrum I am one of those folks that managed to pick up a 2004 for 22k (i was the second owner but 6 months ago 22k was a bargain). So from my point of view had the car not been priced at that level I would not be an owner now. i can justify sepending 30K plus on an SUV for the family but not a 2 seater for myself. Again, i feel for all you folks that have lost thousands, I guess if you are going to keep the car for more than 5 years then you should be ok as the biggest loss has already happend.
However from the other side of the spectrum I am one of those folks that managed to pick up a 2004 for 22k (i was the second owner but 6 months ago 22k was a bargain). So from my point of view had the car not been priced at that level I would not be an owner now. i can justify sepending 30K plus on an SUV for the family but not a 2 seater for myself. Again, i feel for all you folks that have lost thousands, I guess if you are going to keep the car for more than 5 years then you should be ok as the biggest loss has already happend.
Re: End of the Crossfire
I think the Crossfire is one of the best investments there is. Your getting a Mercedes car of about 50k with a hell of alot better looking body for a ton less! I have never ever owned a car that turns heads and people ask what is it so much. I would not part with mine unless I had to.
Mike
Mike
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by mbepic
Bullshit (eye):
Prove to me that the "someone" compared a 63 Corvette and the Crossfire and said it has the same principles, other than to say that they were both Sports Cars;
This last paragraph of yours is the only thing that you have ever said that made any sense at all; yes the competition in the Sports Car market is very tough; the market is diluted with these and THAT is the reason they are not selling like hotcakes.
Now don't ruin your record by coming back and saying anthing as dumb as you have before, PLEASE DON'T
Prove to me that the "someone" compared a 63 Corvette and the Crossfire and said it has the same principles, other than to say that they were both Sports Cars;
This last paragraph of yours is the only thing that you have ever said that made any sense at all; yes the competition in the Sports Car market is very tough; the market is diluted with these and THAT is the reason they are not selling like hotcakes.
Now don't ruin your record by coming back and saying anthing as dumb as you have before, PLEASE DON'T
I'd say that 365hp v-8 makes it pretty damn different.
And everything I say makes sense, you just refuse to except it.
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by NJspeed69
I just don't get it. Why make such a great car and have such little publicity coverage? Put the Crossfire in one of those ads with the 300C damnit. I swear I'd be a better CEO of DCX than whoever that German dude is.
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by brittt1
Bullseye did you say you owned all those cars in your gallery like Mustang,Porsche 911.etc?
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by mbepic
It's quite obvious that you two guys bought the car with a short term in mind; why else would you even consider selling it now, especially if the prices have dropped so much.
If this was not what you had in mind as far as selling only a year or so after the purchase, you got me baffled what your motive for selling is??????????????
If this was not what you had in mind as far as selling only a year or so after the purchase, you got me baffled what your motive for selling is??????????????
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by Bullseye
Originally said by mbepic, "I owned a 65 Coupe, 327-365h.p. for 13 years, fully restored and the fact it was a two-seater, "sports car" makes it no different than the Crossfire."
I'd say that 365hp v-8 makes it pretty damn different.
And everything I say makes sense, you just refuse to except it.
I'd say that 365hp v-8 makes it pretty damn different.
And everything I say makes sense, you just refuse to except it.
Are you soo confused that you can't even remember we were discussing a comparison between the 63 Corvette and the Xfire. Man, you must be on drugs half the time and going to the AA meeting the other half.
BTW, back in 1965, 365h.p. was gross h.p. and todays Xfire is net horsepower; but, you knew that didn't you???????????? It's a shame we have to teach you everything.
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by mbepic
Are you soo confused that you can't even remember we were discussing a comparison between the 63 Corvette and the Xfire. Man, you must be on drugs half the time and going to the AA meeting the other half.
BTW, back in 1965, 365h.p. was gross h.p. and todays Xfire is net horsepower; but, you knew that didn't you???????????? It's a shame we have to teach you everything.
BTW, back in 1965, 365h.p. was gross h.p. and todays Xfire is net horsepower; but, you knew that didn't you???????????? It's a shame we have to teach you everything.
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by Bullseye
Either way, any corvette > than crossfire. Well except the cross-fire injection vettes, I guess they reserve the name " Crossfire" for the crap they put out.
and Bullshit (eye), if you can get out of your confusion just for a second, do you want to tell us what years they used the Crossfire Injection engines??
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by mbepic
and Bullshit (eye), if you can get out of your confusion just for a second, do you want to tell us what years they used the Crossfire Injection engines??
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by Bullseye
I know 82 was one year, not sure about the rest would have to look it up. Its a heap of crap. I hate C3's. So i could really care less.
See Bullshit(eye), you got the memory of a ciph. I taught you what years that engine was installed a couple of months ago, don't you remember. The other year was a C4.
Oh and the C4 was a Corvette generation that you know more than me and all others in the world combined...........right???
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by mbepic
See Bullshit(eye), you got the memory of a ciph. I taught you what years that engine was installed a couple of months ago, don't you remember. The other year was a C4.
Oh and the C4 was a Corvette generation that you know more than me and all others in the world combined...........right???
Oh and the C4 was a Corvette generation that you know more than me and all others in the world combined...........right???
Re: End of the Crossfire
Originally Posted by Bullseye
Why should i remember the worst injection system ever put into a vette? And I dont hold anything you say with high credence. The LT1, LT4, and LT5 are the only C4's worth remembering. Every other C4 was weak, but then again so was almost everything in the era, though the turbo G bodies were great. And all the c4's i worked with were newer than 90. Don't forget you think the crossfire is an excellent example of a sports car. I bet you find Bob Sagat hilarious too. The crossfire, him and you have something in common, you are all lame.
Sorry Bullshit (eye), you got me there, never heard of Bob Sagat. Is he a friend of yours?
Re: End of the Crossfire
If you want to buy a car as an investment, then you should be looking at some vintage and restored model that sits in your garage because you are afraid to take it out on the street. To me the joy in ownership is the thrill of driving. My '04 Crossfire appears to have depreciated about 30 to 35% in the Dallas market; this seems about right. Besides, I intend to keep the car for a long time and it really doesn't matter. Year 1 and year 5 hit the resale value the most on almost any car.