Crossfire Coupe A place to discuss Coupe specific topics.

0 - 60 in ?

Thread Tools
 
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2010 | 03:33 PM
pizzaguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,587
Likes: 974
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default 0 - 60 in ?

Neighbor asked me what my N/A Roadster will do and I was kinda embarrased to admit I didn't know.

So, what CAN be expected from an N/A Roadster, unmodified? ( I assume an N/A Coupe would not be much different.)
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2010 | 04:03 PM
downwardspiral's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

Originally Posted by pizzaguy
Neighbor asked me what my N/A Roadster will do and I was kinda embarrased to admit I didn't know.

So, what CAN be expected from an N/A Roadster, unmodified? ( I assume an N/A Coupe would not be much different.)
From Motorweek
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2340.shtml
.......Jab the pedal, and this Crossfire romps to 60 in 7.1 seconds. With less than 100 pounds of added structural weight, that time is just 6 tenths of a second slower than the Coupe. The quarter mile passes in an equally spirited 15.3 seconds, at 93 miles-per-hour
 

Last edited by downwardspiral; 09-25-2010 at 04:06 PM.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2010 | 04:07 PM
danimal's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 7
From: Yulee, FL
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

You have to appreciate the car for what it is......and is not. It's not a drag racer. But ask your neighbor if he would like to cruise at 140-150....till it runs out of gas!!!!!

Of course, the trick is finding a place to do that!
 
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2010 | 04:11 PM
pizzaguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,587
Likes: 974
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

Thanks DWS, and agreed Dan!
 
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2010 | 04:15 PM
SparkieSRT6's Avatar
SSB SRT6 405hp/401Tq
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,097
Likes: 2
From: Hooterville
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

Take at least 0.1 of a sec. off those times now that you've claybarred and applied NXT 2.0 .....
 
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2010 | 04:18 PM
PNA's Avatar
PNA
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 4
From: Maryland (Central)
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

Originally Posted by downwardspiral
From Motorweek
MotorWeek: Road Test
.......Jab the pedal, and this Crossfire romps to 60 in 7.1 seconds. With less than 100 pounds of added structural weight, that time is just 6 tenths of a second slower than the Coupe. The quarter mile passes in an equally spirited 15.3 seconds, at 93 miles-per-hour
Yeah, the Roadsters are a little heavier, so they are a tad slower. I've seen a number of different numbers for the coupe, avearging from about 6.0 to about 6.4 for a NA coupe (0-60).

MuscleFan21 on the Forum has track numbers for his coupe. Unconfirmed 14.38@96mph, Confirmed 14.40@97mph May want to check those out. Not sure if I recall too many roadster numbers but they'll be about a half second slower on average. Also, there are differences in manual times versus auto times. Again, I've seen them all in similar ranges with some autostick claims better than the manuals, but some manual time better than the autostick.

You'll find a lot of info if you do a search. Either way, it's quick enough and handles well enough for my needs -- and meets my fun factor.
 
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2010 | 05:30 PM
Musclefan21's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 816
Likes: 8
From: Schaumburg, IL
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

Originally Posted by downwardspiral
From Motorweek
MotorWeek: Road Test
.......Jab the pedal, and this Crossfire romps to 60 in 7.1 seconds. With less than 100 pounds of added structural weight, that time is just 6 tenths of a second slower than the Coupe. The quarter mile passes in an equally spirited 15.3 seconds, at 93 miles-per-hour
15.3? Someone needs to learn how to drive ASAP or be fired...
 
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2010 | 06:21 PM
yerdsyerds's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

coupe with an auto trans:

zero to sixty in 7.3 seconds stock
6.1 seconds after all my mods to date, but still waiting for my needswings CAI (on order)...
 
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2010 | 11:23 AM
Goldwing's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 33
From: Holland MI
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

I can't see 100 lbs making a .6 second difference on a 3300 lb car. Proportionately, that's all out of whack. Maybe that "canvas" roof is not as slick as a hardtop. But who drives with the top up?
 
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2010 | 11:37 AM
PNA's Avatar
PNA
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 4
From: Maryland (Central)
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

Originally Posted by Goldwing
I can't see 100 lbs making a .6 second difference on a 3300 lb car. Proportionately, that's all out of whack. Maybe that "canvas" roof is not as slick as a hardtop. But who drives with the top up?

I would tend to agree with you on this, however according to some sources it's more than 100 lbs difference (at least according to some of the sources I checked out). The roadster alledgedly weighs 3174 - 3326lbs -- and the coupe 3060 - 3084 lbs -- so it is alledgelly ranges from ~ 100 to 260 lbs more -- which still isn't insignificant. Not sure which sources are correct. Not sure if there may be other vehicle related things that might affect the 0-60 claims but a 300 lb person equivalent in a car could certainly have an impact. Of course, one's ability to drive a car and get the most out of it (optimizing shifts, etc.) can certainly have a big impact.
 

Last edited by PNA; 09-27-2010 at 11:44 AM.
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2010 | 12:50 PM
Montana Crossfire's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
From: Great Falls, Montana ( Big Sky Country)
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

0-60mph 4.07 seconds!
With better traction I think it could be under 4 seconds.
Oh, I'm sorry I thought this was the SRT site. Not really it's just fun to show off the car
I had a Limited coupe and I am quite sure it was considerably better than 7 seconds.
Regarding the weight difference 100lbs does strange things to excelleration.
It's like me being about 250 pounds sometimes I wish I could find a 140 pound "driver" to see what type of numbers my car COULD post.
Montana
 
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2010 | 09:02 AM
BoilerUpXFire's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,285
Likes: 4
From: Carmel, In.
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

Originally Posted by Montana Crossfire
I wish I could find a 140 pound "driver" to see what type of numbers my car COULD post.
Montana
Let me know when and where, although, I am more like 155
 
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2010 | 10:04 AM
Montana Crossfire's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
From: Great Falls, Montana ( Big Sky Country)
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

Thanks for the offer, will do if the opportunity rises.
Indiana is a fair jaunt from Montana. Heck it seems that everywhere is.
Mike

PS I couldn't couldn't keep from spinnin them a bit but turned another 4.07 with my wife on board yesterday.
Never misunderstand me I am not knocking my 4.07 ! Matter of fact as far as street cars go I brag a bit!!!
 

Last edited by Montana Crossfire; 09-28-2010 at 10:09 AM.
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2010 | 10:13 AM
eruby's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 339
Likes: 3
From: Upstate, SC
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

I bought one of those K.A.T. Matrix 3-Axis Accelerometer - kinda a cheap version of the G-Tech. I have a '05 roadster with a sprintbooster. not sure if that helps or not but this is what the K.A.T. gave me:
1/4 mile:
97 mph
14.87 second
135 hp
154 hp

0-60:
6.34 second
141 hp
161 hp
 
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2010 | 10:34 AM
downwardspiral's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

Originally Posted by Montana Crossfire
Thanks for the offer, will do if the opportunity rises.
Indiana is a fair jaunt from Montana. Heck it seems that everywhere is.
Mike

PS I couldn't couldn't keep from spinnin them a bit but turned another 4.07 with my wife on board yesterday.
Never misunderstand me I am not knocking my 4.07 ! Matter of fact as far as street cars go I brag a bit!!!
Check out this "street car" - 4.53

YouTube - Eric Dillard 4.53@174 MPH!
 
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2010 | 12:05 PM
MikeR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,180
Likes: 8
From: North Plains, OR
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

what was his 0-60 time???? holy smokes that is a fast car....
 
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2010 | 02:47 PM
RapidFire's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

Isn't the 0-60 also due to it shifting at ~55mph?
 
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2010 | 02:11 AM
huntsmcgee's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default Re: 0 - 60 in ?

I went to the strip 100% stock and ran a 14.9 at 95mph and its the auto stick
 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 AM.