Cars that have copied the Crossfire
Re: Cars that have copied the Crossfire
None of those cars copied the Crossfire. Especially the Jaguar. That thing is a blatant rip off from Aston Martin. The DB9 is sex on wheels. Ford owns both Aston and Jaguar so they can do what they want with them.
I think you're simply seeing similar shapes that have been used for ages and relating them to your preferred car.
I think you're simply seeing similar shapes that have been used for ages and relating them to your preferred car.
Re: Cars that have copied the Crossfire
Originally Posted by feets
None of those cars copied the Crossfire. Especially the Jaguar. That thing is a blatant rip off from Aston Martin. The DB9 is sex on wheels. Ford owns both Aston and Jaguar so they can do what they want with them.
I think you're simply seeing similar shapes that have been used for ages and relating them to your preferred car.
I think you're simply seeing similar shapes that have been used for ages and relating them to your preferred car.
The original XK and DB7 really did look almost like twins.
Last edited by Mike-in-Orange; 03-22-2010 at 04:35 PM.
Re: Cars that have copied the Crossfire
Originally Posted by Mr. Max
I was really hot for one of those GT6's. Then I drove one. Still one of the coolest looking cars of the era.
Then like an idiot I traded the TR-7 in on a new '78 Corvette.....dufus I was...
Re: Cars that have copied the Crossfire
Originally Posted by Chris L.
It was fun to drive, like an idiot I traded it in on a new '76 TR-7.....dufus I was....
Then like an idiot I traded the TR-7 in on a new '78 Corvette.....dufus I was...
Then like an idiot I traded the TR-7 in on a new '78 Corvette.....dufus I was...
I could probably say all those same things about the Jaguar XKE, and I would have sold my children to own one of those lol
As far as your trades, you ended up with a Crossfire, a perfected GT6 and you got rid of the ugliest British sportscar ever. (TR7) Sound like things worked out well. Happy Motoring.
Re: Cars that have copied the Crossfire
Originally Posted by Mike-in-Orange
Ford used to own Aston and Jag (and Land Rover, Volvo and most of Mazda) but sold Jag and Land Rover to TATA Motors of India in 2008 and Aston Martin to a consortium of investors lead by David Richards (of ProDrive and WRC fame) back in 2007. Ian Callum, still design director at Jaguar, headed design for both companies for a while under Ford. He penned the Jaguar XK and started work on the DB9, which was later finished by Henrik Fisker (before Fisker left to start his own coachbuilding company and now premium hybrid auto company). Callum also penned the Aston Martin DB7, and that's the car that (if anything) the Jag XK is a rip off of. But if the same guy designed both cars while working for the same parent company,it's less a "ripoff" than an easy and cheap way to develop a new car for what was still an ailing company.
The original XK and DB7 really did look almost like twins.
The original XK and DB7 really did look almost like twins.
Sooooo, if I bought a Jaguar and a Land Rover I'd essentially have a bodacious set of TATA's!
Sorry........ couldn't help myself.
Re: Cars that have copied the Crossfire
Originally Posted by Mr. Max
I was really hot for one of those GT6's. Then I drove one. Still one of the coolest looking cars of the era.
1970 variety (nicer taillights IMO) original ~13,000 miles. Should pull about 450hp out of it.
BTW the V8 with aluminum heads appears lighter than the inline 2.0 - bad news mine will be hot and very noisy.
Last edited by 70GT6; 03-22-2010 at 09:11 PM.
Re: Cars that have copied the Crossfire
Originally Posted by 70GT6
Wow suprised to see anyone even knows the GT6 - Working on a small block & 6 speed conversion of one.
1970 variety (nicer taillights IMO) original ~13,000 miles. Should pull about 450hp out of it.
BTW the V8 with aluminum heads appears lighter than the inline 2.0 - bad news mine will be hot and very noisy.
1970 variety (nicer taillights IMO) original ~13,000 miles. Should pull about 450hp out of it.
BTW the V8 with aluminum heads appears lighter than the inline 2.0 - bad news mine will be hot and very noisy.
The biggest thing I remember about the 1974 Spitfire I had was near catastrophic "negative camber".
LOL...good one Steve.
Re: Cars that have copied the Crossfire
Originally Posted by +fireamx
Please tell me you've got some kind of replacement H.D. rear drive train planned for your project.
The biggest thing I remember about the 1974 Spitfire I had was near catastrophic "negative camber".
LOL...good one Steve.
The biggest thing I remember about the 1974 Spitfire I had was near catastrophic "negative camber".
LOL...good one Steve.
Those little factory rubber doughnuts would "explode" upon right foot usage.
Re: Cars that have copied the Crossfire
Originally Posted by 70GT6
Wow suprised to see anyone even knows the GT6.
Re: Cars that have copied the Crossfire
Originally Posted by 70GT6
Wow suprised to see anyone even knows the GT6 - Working on a small block & 6 speed conversion of one.
1970 variety (nicer taillights IMO) original ~13,000 miles. Should pull about 450hp out of it.
BTW the V8 with aluminum heads appears lighter than the inline 2.0 - bad news mine will be hot and very noisy.
1970 variety (nicer taillights IMO) original ~13,000 miles. Should pull about 450hp out of it.
BTW the V8 with aluminum heads appears lighter than the inline 2.0 - bad news mine will be hot and very noisy.
Your ride is going to be outrageous. Good luck
P.s. Get used to changing half your spark plugs from under the dash. A good scatter shield might be
a good idea
Re: Cars that have copied the Crossfire
Originally Posted by musicnsurf
whaaat? on this forum? we already nailed a pegaso in less than 10 posts. err...i did. i could really be a heretic and say no one here knows about the 2000gt or the original cosmo.