Crossfire Coupe A place to discuss Coupe specific topics.

1965 Ford Shelby Mustang GT350 vs. Crossfire

Thread Tools
 
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2006 | 04:28 PM
PC HOTROD's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default Re: 1965 Ford Shelby Mustang GT350 vs. Crossfire

I find it difficult to compare cars these days based on performance alone.

I recently read a road test for the 2007 Toyota Camry which reported a 14.9 second 1/4 mile run... a damn Camry running 14's!
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2530b.shtml

Prior to purchasing our Crossfire we were looking at a 2006 Chevrolet Impala SS (also sold as the Grand Prix GXP & Monte Carlo SS) that comes standard with a 5.3L 303 HP V8 that flat Hauls AZZ!! I test drove a few of these animals and they are very impressive!!! 0-60 in the 5 - 6 second range. 1/4 mile in the mid/low 14's and tops out at 150 mph... all this and she gets 28 mpg on the hwy due to displacement reduction technology.
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2528a.shtml

The Crossfire "Is What It Is"... a great car that deserves more credit that what it's given. Just be cautious when lining up with those 4 door Camry's, Impala SS's/Grand Prix GXP's and sportier Monte Carlo SS's.
 

Last edited by PC HOTROD; 09-13-2006 at 04:53 PM.
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2006 | 05:12 PM
dynamicS's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Default Re: 1965 Ford Shelby Mustang GT350 vs. Crossfire

Wow, impressive but too bad GM can't make it weird wheel drive instead of that fwd crap, talk about torque steer.
Damn, this is gonna make passing those old fart Camry drivers even more difficult!
 
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2006 | 05:57 PM
hpmotors's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Williamston, SC
Default Re: 1965 Ford Shelby Mustang GT350 vs. Crossfire

I'd been looking at a new "road" car for several years. Criteria set were: 1) price 2) manual transmission 3) rear wheel drive 4) had to be faster than my old '91 SHO.

Lots of BMW's would do this, but failed test 1. Other candidates were the 350Z - cool, fast, but zip luggage space and somehow I couldn't get excited about it. Got real interested in the RX8, read a lot of positive press, then I drove one. Positive expectations fell flat when the rubber hit the road.

The Crossfire hit my radar screen when it came out, but as has been said, it was panned as being "underpowered". Last fall had a slow day, went by the Chrysler dealer at lunch and they had a new 2004 6 speed on the lot.

While not scientific, I like testing cars on a bit of interstate that has exits nominally 2 miles apart. While quite an abbreviated test, running this ramp to ramp lets me test the car on curvy bits (the ramps themselves), see how it goes in a straight line, and how the brakes work. Testing the RX8 and the Crossfire on this same section of interstate, the Mazda won't hit 130 (indicated). The Crossfire does. Real world vs magazine road tests? Don't really know, just what I saw. Heck, could have been speedometer error, but the Crossfire FELT faster. Torque of the V6 vs the rotary? Could be, but I buzzed the rotamotor to redline to keep its power up on the curve.

Impressed me enough so that I really started looking for one in the used arena. Finally found an '05 base with only 6,850 miles. Love it so far - just can't find enough excuses or time to drive it! The bottom line is that a car is more than one part of the performance envelope - its a package. Like my Miata, the Crossfire isn't the fastest thing in a straight line. But add curves to the equation, factor in a sexy body, the Mercedes blood line and you have a real winner.

Henry Payne
'05 Base


 
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2006 | 06:32 PM
PC HOTROD's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default Re: 1965 Ford Shelby Mustang GT350 vs. Crossfire

Well said HPMotors!

Considering that we are only housing 215 hp it sure makes good use of it.

Something that I noticed about the Crossfire when driving is that it does not have a so-called flat spot in the power band. Most magazine tests always reference where a vehicle falls flat, but not the Crossfire... it seems to have a good pull all-around. Maybe due to the advance intake system.

It's All Good!
 
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2006 | 09:14 PM
Sennaspirit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 5
From: Magnolia, DE
Default Re: 1965 Ford Shelby Mustang GT350 vs. Crossfire

Originally Posted by dynamicS
Whoa woo whoa! I find it very hard to believe the S2K has more power than the Limited XF. I've raced one a couple months ago from a 30 mph roll, and all it did was make a lot of noise while it stayed right behind me for a at least a 1/4 mile. And I doubt it can take the Limited off the line from a dig.
D,

The S2K has 240 hp, BUT the torque is far less than the XF and, as you noted, you need to get way up in the rev band to get the benefit of that torque in the s2k...needless to say, it's not a great off the line car.
 
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2006 | 10:00 PM
jp2005's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Default Re: 1965 Ford Shelby Mustang GT350 vs. Crossfire

why did this old thread pop back up.

i do understand when it comes to racing on a road, an s2k generally gets beat, however at the track they consistently run low-mid 14's -- so yes they are faster.
 
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 09-14-2006 | 01:40 AM
adoni's Avatar
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 254
Likes: 4
From: Maryville, TN
Default Re: 1965 Ford Shelby Mustang GT350 vs. Crossfire

I don't know about others, but driving down the road in 1/4 mile sections to get somewhere isn't how I judge a car's performance, nor is it how I drive to get from point A to point B. I have a friend that owns a Viper, one of the first... it's fast, it's dangerous ...

... but ...

Can it take going 135 MPH for long periods of time? I had a 1966 MGB, it was a dog off the line, but on the road it handled every curve the engineers could throw at it and it ran and ran and ran and ... well ... ran at high speeds for long periods of time.

To me, a cars performance should be rated on the long run. The 1/4 mile segments ... those are just peeing contests - IMO.

I think my XF takes the long runs better than my friends Viper ... and when people see his Viper they know what it is ... when the see my XF ... I get asked what it is.
 
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 09-14-2006 | 09:08 AM
xfire downunder's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default Re: 1965 Ford Shelby Mustang GT350 vs. Crossfire

Firstly, I absolutely love my Crossfire.
When I test drove it for the first time, I knew I would buy it but I also began scheming as to how to get more straight line acceleration.
Mine is an auto and I agree the the SRT is the one to get if you really want acceleration. I am just frustrated that if top end was compromised a little, a whole lot more could have been gained down low by specifying lower diff gears- damn those autobahns!!
 
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 09-14-2006 | 10:11 AM
+fireamx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,507
Likes: 6
From: Akron, Ohio
Default Re: 1965 Ford Shelby Mustang GT350 vs. Crossfire

Originally Posted by adoni
I don't know about others, but driving down the road in 1/4 mile sections to get somewhere isn't how I judge a car's performance, nor is it how I drive to get from point A to point B. I have a friend that owns a Viper, one of the first... it's fast, it's dangerous ...

... but ...

Can it take going 135 MPH for long periods of time? I had a 1966 MGB, it was a dog off the line, but on the road it handled every curve the engineers could throw at it and it ran and ran and ran and ... well ... ran at high speeds for long periods of time.

To me, a cars performance should be rated on the long run. The 1/4 mile segments ... those are just peeing contests - IMO.

I think my XF takes the long runs better than my friends Viper ... and when people see his Viper they know what it is ... when the see my XF ... I get asked what it is.
Adoni, If your friends Viper is one of the first, that means it's a roadster. I've got a '96 GTS. The coupe has it all over the roadsters in nearly every way except "wind in your hair, sun on your bald spot" driving.
Trust me, at 135 mph my Viper is idling at around 3,000 rpm of its 6,000 rpm red line. It will do 135 all day. I've had it to 140 on one occasion, and I honestly didn't realize I was going that fast until I noticed the traffic a half mile ahead of me (that was doing 75) looked as though it had stopped.
I can't give you an honest opinion on how it compares to my Crossfire at those high speeds because I've only had the Crossfire up to around 110. But I've read where it's rock steady at autobahn speeds and I wouldn't doubt it.
As for the Viper being scary and dangerous, the answer is yes, if you get a little crazy with it, it will come back and bite you. But what else would you expect from a 450 hp SNAKE?
In the real world, day in day out driving, I totally agree with ya, give me the Crossfire. Maybe that's why I haven't taken the Viper out of the garage even once since the Crossfire showed up.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brandoni
Crossfire SRT6
28
08-21-2015 10:20 PM
RED DOG
-C-I-C-C-I Discussion
25
07-26-2015 07:25 AM
texas t
Other Cars
10
07-25-2015 01:50 AM
WindRestrictor
Commercial Sponsor Classifieds
0
06-16-2015 12:18 PM
MJPowers
Crossfire Awards and Trophies
6
06-08-2015 02:34 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: 1965 Ford Shelby Mustang GT350 vs. Crossfire



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 AM.